Individual positioning a comparative study of adjuvant breast radiotherapy in the prone versus supine position /

PURPOSE: To study breast radiotherapy in the prone vs. supine positions through dosimetry and clinical implementation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Conformal radiotherapy plans in 61 patients requiring only breast irradiation were developed for both the prone and supine positions. After evaluation of the...

Teljes leírás

Elmentve itt :
Bibliográfiai részletek
Szerzők: Varga Zoltán
Hideghéty Katalin
Mező Tamás Bálint
Nikolényi Alíz
Thurzó László
Kahán Zsuzsanna
Dokumentumtípus: Cikk
Megjelent: 2009
Sorozat:INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS 75 No. 1
doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.045

mtmt:1339903
Online Access:http://publicatio.bibl.u-szeged.hu/12549
LEADER 02597nab a2200265 i 4500
001 publ12549
005 20200305144644.0
008 171221s2009 hu o 0|| zxx d
022 |a 0360-3016 
024 7 |a 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.045  |2 doi 
024 7 |a 1339903  |2 mtmt 
040 |a SZTE Publicatio Repozitórium  |b hun 
041 |a zxx 
100 1 |a Varga Zoltán 
245 1 0 |a Individual positioning  |h [elektronikus dokumentum] :  |b a comparative study of adjuvant breast radiotherapy in the prone versus supine position /  |c  Varga Zoltán 
260 |c 2009 
300 |a 94-100 
490 0 |a INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS  |v 75 No. 1 
520 3 |a PURPOSE: To study breast radiotherapy in the prone vs. supine positions through dosimetry and clinical implementation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Conformal radiotherapy plans in 61 patients requiring only breast irradiation were developed for both the prone and supine positions. After evaluation of the of the first 20 plan pairs, the patients were irradiated in the prone or supine position in a randomized fashion. These cases were analyzed for repositioning accuracy and skin reactions related to treatment position and patient characteristics. RESULTS: The planning target volume covered with 47.5-53.5 Gy in the prone vs. the supine position was 85.1% +/- 4.2% vs. 89.2 +/- 2.2%, respectively (p < 0.0001). Radiation exposure of the ipsilateral lung, expressed in terms of the mean lung dose and the V(20Gy), was dramatically lower in the prone vs. supine position (p < 0.0001), but the doses to the heart did not differ. There was no difference in the need to correct positioning during radiotherapy, but the extent of displacement was significantly higher in the prone vs. supine position (p = 0.021). The repositioning accuracy in the prone position exhibited an improvement over time and did not depend on any patient-related parameters. Significantly more radiodermatitis of Grade 1-2 developed following prone vs. supine irradiation (p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Conformal breast radiotherapy is feasible in the prone position. Its primary advantage is the substantially lower radiation dose to the ipsilateral lung. The higher dose inhomogeneity and increased rate of Grade 1-2 skin toxicity, however, may be of concern. 
700 0 1 |a Hideghéty Katalin  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Mező Tamás Bálint  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Nikolényi Alíz  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Thurzó László  |e aut 
700 0 1 |a Kahán Zsuzsanna  |e aut 
856 4 0 |u http://publicatio.bibl.u-szeged.hu/12549/1/1_s2.0_S0360301608036900_main_u.pdf  |z Dokumentum-elérés