Common Practice of Percutaneous Drainage in Necrotising Pancreatitis-A Multicentre Retrospective Study (DRACULA)

Acute necrotising pancreatitis carries high mortality, especially if infected necrosis occurs. While percutaneous drainage may be required when internal drainage is not feasible, reliable guidelines for managing percutaneous drains are lacking. This study aimed to assess the common practice of percu...

Teljes leírás

Elmentve itt :
Bibliográfiai részletek
Szerzők: Vornhülz Marlies
Sirtl Simon
Xu Yujun
Klauss Sarah
Orgler-Gasche Elisabeth
Bezmarevic Mihailo
Jovanovic Milan
Ricci Claudio
Fernandez Y Viesca Michael
Arvanitakis Marianna
Hadi Amer
Prahm August Pilegaard
Di Mauro Davide
Ruess Dietrich A
Focke Carola
Bender Fabienne
Hamm Jacob
Ammer-Herrmenau Christoph
Gonçalves Tiago Cúrdia
Gonçalves João Carlos
Calavrezos Lenika
Götz Mara
Stoerzer Simon
Schmelzle Moritz
Nawacki Łukasz
Condori Carlos
Seitzinger Max
Seelig Julian
Chooklin Serge
Chuklin Serhii
Erőss Bálint Mihály
Hegyi Péter
Kollaborációs szervezet: DRACULA study group
Czakó László
et al
Dokumentumtípus: Cikk
Megjelent: 2025
Sorozat:UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL 13 No. 10
Tárgyszavak:
doi:10.1002/ueg2.70133

mtmt:36411907
Online Access:http://publicatio.bibl.u-szeged.hu/38744
Leíró adatok
Tartalmi kivonat:Acute necrotising pancreatitis carries high mortality, especially if infected necrosis occurs. While percutaneous drainage may be required when internal drainage is not feasible, reliable guidelines for managing percutaneous drains are lacking. This study aimed to assess the common practice of percutaneous drainage therapy for infected pancreatic necrosis.This retrospective study among 29 tertiary care centres included all patients hospitalised for necrotising acute pancreatitis from 01/2016 until 12/2022 with at least one percutaneous drain. The length of hospital stay was the primary endpoint, with mortality as the secondary endpoint. Between-group comparisons were conducted using the ratio of restricted mean survival time (RMST) after adjusting for confounders.585 patients (67% male) from 29 tertiary care centres in 15 countries in Europe, Canada and Bolivia were included in the analysis. Length of hospitalisation or mortality did not differ between the flushed (n = 398) and non-flushed groups (RMST ratio 1.04, p-value = 0.42 and RMST ratio 1.05, p-value = 0.1 respectively). Mortality was significantly lower in those patients who received a combination of percutaneous and internal drains (dual-modality drainage, n = 243) as compared to those who received percutaneous drains only (RMST ratio 1.05, p-value = 0.01). Flushing with antibiotics as compared to saline was not associated with shorter length of hospital stay or lower mortality (RMST ratio 0.98, p-value = 0.78 and 0.97, p-value = 0.48 respectively).This study reveals notable differences in therapeutic concepts and flushing management for percutaneous drains. While flushing itself was not associated with a shorter length of hospitalisation or lower in-hospital mortality, a lower mortality was observed when internal and percutaneous drainage were used in combination.The study was prospectively registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien, DRKS) under the registration number DRKS00032231.
Terjedelem/Fizikai jellemzők:2075-2089
ISSN:2050-6406