Az igekötők jelentésmódosító szerepe és a nyelvi norma
Since the end of the 19th century Hungarian language cultivation has been writing critically about so called “unnecessary verbal prefixes”. According to the language cultivators a prefix is unnecessary if the verb has the same meaning with or without it. In one class the prefix makes the verb perfec...
Elmentve itt :
| Szerző: | |
|---|---|
| Dokumentumtípus: | Cikk |
| Megjelent: |
2006
|
| Sorozat: | Nyelvtudomány
2 |
| Kulcsszavak: | Magyar nyelv - igekötő, Nyelvtudomány |
| Tárgyszavak: | |
| Online Access: | http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/1167 |
| Tartalmi kivonat: | Since the end of the 19th century Hungarian language cultivation has been writing critically about so called “unnecessary verbal prefixes”. According to the language cultivators a prefix is unnecessary if the verb has the same meaning with or without it. In one class the prefix makes the verb perfective, although the verb has perfective aspect without it, too: pótol ’replace; make up’ ~ bepótol ’replace; make up’; jelentkezik ’present oneself, report’ bejelentkezik ’present oneself, report’. In the other class the speakers replace the prefix by another one, but the meaning does not change: megszüntet ’stop, cease; abandon’ beszüntet ’stop, cease; abandon’. I have collected verbs which have been disapproved in the reference books of language cultivation in the last hundred years. I suggest that although the most verbs are really new, but their rise was not unusual. The prefixes are not unnecessary, because it seems to appear a new rule in Hungarian. Namely a verb is perfective if it has a prefix. And the speakers do not deal with the perfective meaning of the verb. In the other case, if an old prefix is replaced with a new, not only the new form remains, but the old one too, and they will develop different meanings later. |
|---|---|
| Terjedelem/Fizikai jellemzők: | 165-186 |
| ISSN: | 1786-7428 |