Imago dei and desire in Genesis 1-3. - to eat or not to eat; or rather to eat or what to eat /
Within modern criticism, particularly with references to Levinas and Girard, the article is the revision of the traditional interpretation relating imago Dei with the story of temptation and expulsion. The two creation accounts hold different perspectives on creation. P holds a theocentric perspecti...
Elmentve itt :
| Szerző: | |
|---|---|
| Dokumentumtípus: | Könyv része |
| Megjelent: |
1992
|
| Sorozat: | Acta Universitatis Szegediensis de Attila József nominatae : papers in english and american studies
4 Papers in English and American studies : Tomus IV. - Literary theory and biblical hermeneutics : proceedings of the International Conference: "Reading Scripture - Literary Criticism and Biblical Hermeneutics", Pannonhalma, 4-6 July, 1991 4 |
| Kulcsszavak: | Hermeneutika - bibliai, Bibliamagyarázat |
| Tárgyszavak: | |
| Online Access: | http://acta.bibl.u-szeged.hu/68663 |
| Tartalmi kivonat: | Within modern criticism, particularly with references to Levinas and Girard, the article is the revision of the traditional interpretation relating imago Dei with the story of temptation and expulsion. The two creation accounts hold different perspectives on creation. P holds a theocentric perspective and G and antropocentric one. Due to the tension between the two accounts, they can be seen as a negotiation of the two concepts, explicating the difference between violence replacement and irreplacebility. The difference appears particularly in G's obsession with food and the idea if what to eat and what not to eat. |
|---|---|
| Terjedelem/Fizikai jellemzők: | 203-216 |
| ISSN: | 0230-2780 |